kind of disappointed with my avata 2 after coming from a regular camera drone - anyone else feel this way
- Replies 1
- Views 59
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
flight_path_pro 1 post
-
David Martinez 1 post
so i picked up the avata 2 a few months back because i wanted to try fpv and all the videos made it look like the most fun thing ever. and it is fun dont get me wrong, learning to fly it in manual mode is genuinely a blast and the immersive goggles experience is unlike anything ive done with my mini
but im starting to realize that for actual usable footage - like stuff i want to keep and show people - its just not quite there compared to my old air 2s. the image quality is decent but the stabilization in manual mode is pretty demanding to get right and i spent a lot of time getting shots that were just slightly too shaky to use. horizon tilts, overcorrections, stuff like that. maybe thats just skill issue and i need more stick time
i guess i went in thinking i could replace my regular drone with it and thats just not realistic. they do completely different things. the avata is incredible for certain shots, like flying through a gap or low fast passes over water, but for just getting clean establishing shots of a landscape its kind of annoying to use compared to a normal drone where you just hover and let the gimbal do the work
anyone else made this comparison? or switched back to a traditional drone after trying fpv? not trying to trash the avata 2 at all, more just recalibrating my expectations