thinking about swapping to a heavier payload setup ? is the image quality jump actually worth it
- Replies 1
- Views 30
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Emily Foster 1 post
-
TechDrone_Guy 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
honestly depends so much on what your clients are actually doing with the footage. if they're putting it on instagram or even broadcast TV at 1080p the Mavic 3 Pro is more than capable and nobody is g
-
the portability thing is real and i think people underestimate how much it changes your workflow. i rented an Inspire 2 setup for a job last year before i commited to buying anything and yeah the foot
been shooting on a Mavic 3 Pro for about a year and a half now, mostly real estate and some light commercial stuff. the 4/3 sensor on it is genuinely pretty good and i dont have many complaints day to day but ive been getting some bigger jobs lately where clients are asking about raw output and the limitations are starting to show, especially in high contrast situations where the shadow recovery just isnt there.
ive been looking at moving to something like the Inspire 3 with the X9-8K air or maybe even exploring the Sony ILX-LR1 on a third party platform, but that's a pretty significant jump in terms of cost, portability, and just the whole operational footprint. setting up takes way longer, you really need a second person to operate properly, insurance starts to get more complicated.
so my actual question is ? for people who have made this kind of jump from a prosumer integrated camera to a proper interchangeable lens system on a heavier platform, was it genuinely transformative or is it more of a marginal improvement that only matters in very specific situations. im not doubting the specs, i know the X9 is objectively better, but in real world shooting how often does it actually matter