O3 vs lightbridge interference comparison ? anyone actually tested this in dense urban areas
- Replies 1
- Views 26
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Rachel Green 1 post
-
Lisa Chang 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
yeah so ive been going back and forth on this for a while and i cant find a definitive answer. i fly mostly in a pretty built up city environment, lots of 2.4 and 5.8 congestion obviously, buildings, the whole deal. currently on an older mavic 2 pro with ocusync 2 and honestly the signal holds up pretty well most of the time but ive had some sketchy moments in certain areas where i think im just getting hammered by wifi interference from apartment blocks.
my buddy has a mavic 3 with O3 and swears its way better in the same spots but i cant tell if hes just drinking the kool aid or if O3 genuinely handles urban RF environments better. the frequency hopping on O3 is supposedly more aggressive but ive also read that it doesnt actually help much if the whole 2.4ghz band is just saturated.
has anyone done any kind of real world back to back on this, not just range tests in a field but actual urban flying with wifi everywhere. curious what people actually experienced not just what the spec sheet says