EVO II Pro vs EVO II Pro V3 ? is the upgrade actually worth it or am i being sold on marketing
- Replies 1
- Views 54
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
drone_master_42 1 post
-
fpv_racer_360 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
I went from the original to the V3 last year and honestly for real estate specifically I'd say the gimbal improvement alone might be worth it if you're doing a lot of interior courtyard type shots or
-
tbh i'd be skeptical of any drone company calling something a V3 without a sensor change. sounds like mostly software and maybe some build quality tweaks. not saying it's bad just... the original EVO
so ive had the original EVO II Pro (the 6K one with the 1 inch sensor) for about two years now and im seeing a lot of talk about the V3 version. my local shop is offering a trade-in deal and im trying to figure out if this is actually a meaningful hardware upgrade or if Autel just slapped a new name on it and called it a day.
from what i can tell the sensor is the same Sony IMX383 which is kind of whatever, the main differences seem to be around the gimbal stabilization and some transmission system improvements. i do a lot of real estate and some event work so the footage quality is the core thing for me, not necessarily the transmission range since i dont fly that far out anyway.
has anyone actually done a side by side on these? the footage i've seen online comparing them is all over the place quality wise which makes it hard to judge if the differences are from the drone or just different pilots and lighting conditions. curious if anyone has hands on time with both.