NDVI vs RGB cameras for early disease detection - worth the upgrade?
- Replies 2
- Views 117
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
drone_hobbyist_2024 1 post
-
quad_tech_guru 1 post
-
drone_master_42 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
NDVI absolutely catches stress earlier than RGB, but "2-3 weeks" is marketing fluff. Realistically, you might gain 5-10 days on disease detection, which can be critical during rapid infection periods.
-
Been using NDVI for three seasons now. Processing workflow is the biggest pain point - you need software that can handle the spectral analysis, and most farm management systems just display pretty pic
-
Honestly, for $8K you could hire a crop consultant to scout your fields manually for several seasons. NDVI is cool tech but the ROI math is questionable unless you're running thousands of acres. RGB c
Currently running a basic setup with standard RGB cameras for crop scouting, but considering upgrading to multispectral NDVI for better disease detection capabilities. The price jump is significant - around $8K more for a decent NDVI sensor package.
For those using NDVI sensors: are you actually catching diseases 2-3 weeks earlier than visual scouting? How's the data processing workflow - do you need specialized software or can existing farm management systems handle the multispectral data?
Main crops are soybeans and wheat, dealing with typical fungal issues like septoria and rust.