I've been using my Air 2S for real estate photography for about 2 years now and it's been solid. But I keep seeing all the hype about the Air 3S with its dual camera system and better low-light performance.

For those who've made the jump - is it really worth the investment? I mainly shoot residential properties during golden hour and sometimes need interior shots through windows. The 1-inch sensor sounds appealing but I'm not sure if it justifies the cost.

• How much better is the image quality in challenging lighting?
• Is the telephoto lens actually useful for real estate work?
• Any reliability issues with the newer model?

Made the switch 3 months ago and honestly, the difference in dynamic range is incredible. The Air 3S delivers exceptional image quality with improved low-light performance - you can actually see interior details through windows now without blown highlights.

The telephoto lens is a game changer for property shots! You can get those compressed establishing shots without flying way back, plus it's great for detail work on architectural features. Battery life is noticeably better too.

I'd stick with the 2S personally. The weight puts it in a stricter regulatory category which means more restrictions on where you can fly. For real estate work, that might limit your job sites more than the camera improvements help.