2.4 vs 5.8 in a suburban area ? which one actually works better for you
- Replies 1
- Views 4
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
prop_wash_king 1 post
-
Amanda Singh 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
okay so ive been going back and forth on this for a while and i feel like i get a different answer every time i ask. im flying mostly in suburban neighborhoods, lots of houses, lots of wifi routers, probably a decent amount of bluetooth garbage floating around too. using a mavic 3 classic with the RC-N1 controller.
the conventional wisdom ive heard is that 2.4ghz travels farther and penetrates better but its more congested, and 5.8 is less crowded but shorter range and worse through obstacles. but like, in practice does that actually hold up? because i was flying last weekend and had some pretty bad signal stuttering and i was only maybe 800 feet out with clear line of sight. switched to auto and it seemed to help but i want to understand what its actually doing when it picks the frequency. does it just constantly scan and hop or does it lock in at the start of the flight?
genuinely curious what people are seeing in the real world, not just the spec sheet answer.