switching from fatshark to walksnail, is the latency actually that bad
- Replies 1
- Views 1
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
rotor_king 1 post
-
quad_flyer_x 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running fatshark dominators with a rapidfire module for a few years now and honestly the analog setup has been pretty solid, but im starting to feel like im the last person on the planet still running analog for freestyle. everyone at my local field has moved to digital and i keep borrowing my buddy's walksnail avatar setup just to mess around with it and yeah the picture quality is night and day, like genuinely embarrassing how much better it looks.
but here's the thing ? when i fly his quad i swear i can feel some kind of lag compared to what im used to. he says im imagining it and that walksnail is like 22ms or whatever but i dunno, flying through tight gaps it just feels slightly off to me. could be placebo could be real. has anyone else felt this when switching over, and did it go away after you adjusted or is this just a thing you live with. im not racing just doing freestyle and the occasional cinematic type stuff.
also open to hearing if HDZero is worth considering instead, i know it has lower latency numbers on paper but the range thing has always made me nervous