vtx output power vs antenna quality ? which actually matters more for range
- Replies 1
- Views 83
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
James Martinez 1 post
-
quad_crasher_99 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
been having this argument with a guy at my club for like two months now. he swears by running max power on his vtx (600mw on a 5.8 setup) with stock antennas and says thats all you need. im on the opposite side, i run 200mw but spent actual money on a pair of lumenier axii antennas on the quad side and a crosshair panel on the ground.
we've done some informal range tests and honestly the results are kind of all over the place depending on the environment. in open fields he gets maybe slightly more distance before breakup but in anything with obstacles or buildings my setup seems to handle multipath way better and the image stays cleaner. i feel like antenna quality and polarization matching is being slept on by a lot of people and everyone just cranks the power thinking that fixes everything
is there any actual data or consensus on this or is it just gonna depend on the specific setup forever