2.4 vs 5.8 in a suburban environment ? what are people actually running
- Replies 1
- Views 28
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
Emma Watson 1 post
-
Michael Santos 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
5.8 in suburbs is hit or miss in my experience. you get less congestion sure but the penetration is worse and the moment theres any physical obstruction, a house, a tree line, whatever, you feel it wa
-
honestly for anything under 500 meters in a suburban context just dont overthink the frequency selection and focus more on your flight path relative to the controller. line of sight to your RC matters
yeah this has been bugging me for a while and i finally decided to just ask. i fly mostly in suburbs, like residential neighborhoods with HOA approval for some real estate work, and the RF environment is just absolutely disgusting. wifi on every channel, baby monitors, the works. i switched everything to 5.8 thinking the 2.4 congestion was killing my range but honestly im not sure i made it better.
running a autel evo 2 pro if that matters, and the controller signal seems ok but ive had two moments where it gave me a weak signal warning under 400 meters which shouldnt be happening. no RC link drops but the telemetry gets jittery and the video stutters pretty bad. i tried doing a spectrum scan with a wifi analyzer app just to see what the 2.4 space looked like and yeah its absolutely packed, like every channel has something on it. 5.8 looked cleaner but range takes a hit obviously.
curious what other people flying in dense areas are actually doing, whether theres a sweet spot or youre just accepting some level of garbage signal and flying conservatively