Inspire 2 vs Inspire 3 for actual paid cinema work ? is the jump worth it
- Replies 1
- Views 14
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
sky_wanderer 1 post
-
fpv_flyer_2024 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running an Inspire 2 with the Zenmuse X7 for about three years now, done a bunch of commercial stuff, some music videos, one feature doc that got into a few festivals. the setup has been rock solid honestly and i know the camera inside out at this point. but im starting to lose jobs to people showing up with Inspire 3s and clients are noticing the difference when they compare footage in the edit bay.
the thing is the Inspire 3 is a massive investment when you factor in the lenses and the licensing for the full CinemaDNG raw output. like we're talking close to 20k all in by the time youre actually ready to shoot. my X7 kit is almost fully paid off and its performing fine. but the 8K raw and the much better low light on the Inspire 3 is genuinely hard to argue with, especially on the night stuff where i feel like im always pushing the X7 too hard.
anyone who made this jump recently, was it from actual client demand or more like a future proofing thing? and did the dual operator requirement ever become a problem on smaller shoots where you just dont have the budget for a dedicated pilot and camera op both