O3 vs lightbridge actual real world interference resistance
- Replies 1
- Views 83
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
prop_spinner_joe 1 post
Popular Days
Most Helpful Posts
-
lightbridge nostalgia is real and i get it. but honestly i think a lot of the O3 complaints you see are people flying with their phone connected on 5ghz wifi at the same time or having bluetooth on, w
-
tbh i think you might be overthinking it. ive been flying the mavic 3 in downtown chicago and havent had anything worse than my old phantom did. most of those forum horror stories are from early firmw
Featured Replies
This topic is locked, but your permissions allow you to add new replies.
okay so ive been reading a lot of the spec sheets and marketing stuff obviously says O3 is better in every way but i wanted to get some actual opinions from people flying both in environments that arent a perfectly clear field. specifically thinking about urban flying, near wifi dense apartment buildings and that kind of thing.
im upgrading from an older phantom 4 pro which has lightbridge and honestly that thing was a tank when it came to signal, ive flown it in some pretty congested areas downtown and rarely had real issues beyond maybe a bit of video breakup. now looking at the mavic 3 and im seeing some people complain about interference problems in cities and it has me second guessing. is O3 actually worse in dense RF environments or is this just people not setting things up right? curious if anyone has done like an actual side by side or at least has experience with both systems in similar conditions.