switching from fatshark to walksnail - worth it or am i just chasing hype
- Replies 1
- Views 59
- Created
- Last Reply
Top Posters In This Topic
-
quad_crusher 1 post
-
gimbal_guru_42 1 post
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
so ive been running my dominator HD3s for like 3 years now and honestly they still work fine but everyone in my local group keeps talking about walksnail and how its basically replaced analog for them. i fly mostly freestyle, some light racing, nothing cinematic. my current setup is the HDs with a rapidfire module and a couple lhcp pagoda antennas on the goggle side, using raceband vtx on the quads usually around 200mw.
the thing is i dont really have issues with my current setup? like the video quality could be better sure but its not like im losing feed constantly or whatever. my main hesitation is cost obviously but also the latency question - i keep seeing people say walksnail is totally fine for freestyle but then other people are like nah stick to analog if you actually care about snappy response. cant figure out who to believe because everyone seems to have an agenda either way.
anyone actually switched from a similar analog setup and regret it or not? also curious what antennas people are running on the avatar goggles if that matters